Pocket Guide to Factfinding

$27.00

By M. Carol Stevens, Janae Novotny, and Janet Cory Sommer
2nd edition, 2016

SKU: FACT16 Category:

Description

This compact resource explains the statutory requirements, best practices and practical basics for the four public sector labor relations statutes in California that require factfinding…EERA, HEERA, MMBA and IHSSEERA.

CPER’s newest guide covers:

  • Impasse and factfinding process
  • Analyzing and presenting factfinding criteria
  • Factfinding and the good faith duty to bargain
  • Scope of bargaining and factfinding
  • Major court cases and decisions
  • Pertinent statutes
  • PERB regulations
  • Resources
  • Factfinding timelines
Table of Contents

Contents

I. Introduction 1
    A. Statutory Requirements 1
    B. Best Practices 1
    C. Practical Basics 2
II. Impasse and Factfinding Process 3
    A. Statutory Requirements 3
        1. Educational Employment Relations Act and Higher Education
Employer-Employee Relations Act
4
        2. Meyers-Milias-Brown Act and In-Home Supportive Services
Employer-Employee Relations Act
9
        3. Impact and effects issues are subject to factfinding 13
    B. The Practical Process 15
        1. Purpose 15
        2. Burden of persuasion 16
        3. Hearing procedures 16
        4. Factfinding report 17
III. Analyzing and Presenting Factfinding Criteria 18
    A. Comparison of Wages, Hours, and Conditions of Employment 18
        1. Factfinders view comparability, with ability
to pay, as the most
important factfinding criteria
18
        2. Factfinders prefer a list of comparable agencies that the public
agency and the union have agreed on and used for similar
purposes
19
        3. Factfinders favor well-documented rationale for a proposed set
of comparables, as well as well-documented data from
a party’s selected comparators
19
        4. The party proposing a change from a historical universe of
comparable agencies has the burden of demonstrating
both that the earlier universe is inappropriate and that
the universe it now proposes is appropriate
23
        5. When considering the appropriateness of a universe of
comparison agencies, factfinders generally look
to certain criteria
23
    B. Interest and Welfare of the Public and the Financial Ability of
the Public Agency
26
        1. Raise ability-to-pay at the outset of negotiations 26
        2. Ability-to-pay involves many factors, not just the immediate crisis 27
        3. The agency budget alone is not persuasive 28
        4. Do not rely solely on an ability-to-pay argument and neglect a
thorough analysis of other statutory factfinding criteria
29
        5. If the parties’ final offers are close, ability to-pay arguments
will be minimized
31
        6. A factfinder may not be persuaded by an ability-to-pay argument
if the agency appears not to control its own expenditures
and appears to be making only expenditure priority choices
31
        7. The accuracy of the agency’s budgeting process, including
projections and assumptions, must be able to withstand
contrary evidence
32
        8. The agency’s budget accuracy will be tested historically by
comparing projected versus actual changes in general
fund balances
32
        9. The interests and welfare of the public 33
    C. Consumer Price Index (CPI)/Cost of Living 34
        1. Consumer-price-index basics 34
        2. What is the difference between the CPI-U and the CPI-W? 34
        3. Comparison of total compensation and CPI increases 35
        4. Using the appropriate statistical region or report 35
        5. Understanding CPI-related statistical and mathematical
calculation
36
        6. Using 5- or 10-year historical CPI statistics 36
        7. Using trends for the past months to project the CPI prospectively 37
    D. Applicable State and Federal Laws 37
    E. Local Rules (MMBA and IHSS-EERA Only) 38
    F. Overall Compensation 38
    G. Stipulation of Parties 39
    H. Other Factors Traditionally Considered 39
IV. Factfinding and the Good Faith Duty to Bargain 40
    A. Duty to Bargain Includes Impasse and Impasse Procedures 40
    B. Continuation of the Status Quo and the Duty to Bargain After
Expiration of Contract/MOU
41
    C. Breaking Impasse and Reviving Negotiations 42
    D. Last, Best, and Final Offer Requirements 44
    E. Unilateral Adoption of a Duration Clause Cannot Waive a Union’s Right to Negotiate 45
    F. Strikes and Impasse Procedures 46
V. Scope of Bargaining and Factfinding 47
    A. Insistence to Impasse on Non-Mandatory Subject of Bargaining
Violates the Duty to Bargain
47
    B. Party Must Protest the Submission of a Non-Mandatory Subject
to Factfinding
48
    C. Factfinding Panel Lacks Jurisdiction to Determine Whether or
Not a Subject Is Within the Scope of Bargaining
48
    D. Procedure for Raising a Scope of Bargaining Issue During
Factfinding
49
VI. Major Court and PERB Decisions 53
    A. Definition of Impasse 53
    B. Declaring and Determining Impasse 53
    C. Breaking Impasse and Reviving Negotiations 54
    D. Duty to Participate in Good Faith in Impasse Procedures 55
    E. Duty to Participate in Good Faith in Impasse to Impasse 56
    F. Post-Impasse 59
VII. Statutes 60
    A. Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA) 61
    B. Educational Employment Relations Act (EERA) 65
    C. Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act (HEERA) 70
    D. In-Home Supportive Services Employer-Employee Relations Act (IHSSEERA) 76
VIII. Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) Regulations 81
    Article 6. Impasse Procedures 81
IX. PERB Resources 88
X. Factfinding Timelines 89
    A. Impasse and Factfinding Timeline: EERA and HEERA 89
    B. Impasse and Factfinding Timeline: MMBA 92
    C. Impasse and Factfinding Timeline: IHSS 95
11. Table of Cases 98